Ohio's 8th Congressional District Blog

"Displaced:" How A Gov't Takeover of Health Care Hurts America's Seniors
Posted by Press Office on October 26, 2009
As has been the case for months now, Democrats in Washington continue to engage in a debate among themselves over their government takeover of health care. One issue, however, where House Democrats have stood united from the get-go is paying for these costly proposals in part by implementing drastic cuts to Medicare benefits for seniors “on a scale not seen in years.” As a result, millions would see reduced benefits and be “displaced” from their current coverage, according to independent experts. Last month, Democrats in Washington grew so desperate to conceal the consequences of these drastic cuts that they imposed a “gag order” to prevent America’s seniors from knowing the truth. Even so, more than twice as many Americans said in a recent poll that Democrats’ government takeover of health care would hurt Medicare. Republicans are committed to ensuring seniors know the facts while offering better solutions to make their coverage more affordable and accessible. 

Congressman John Boehner (R-West Chester) commented on Democrats’ continued efforts to cut Medicare benefits for seniors:

“Right now, America’s seniors are looking for reassurances that their current coverage won’t be hurt by a government takeover of health care, and Washington Democrats are unable to oblige. That’s because their trillion-dollar, 1,000-page plans would leave seniors with reduced benefits and fewer health care choices. Republicans are committed to ensuring America’s seniors know the facts while offering better solutions to make their coverage more affordable and accessible.”


A GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER OF HEALTH CARE HURTS AMERICA’S SENIORS:

RHETORIC: Nobody is talking about reducing Medicare benefits. … It works. We don't want to change it.” (President Obama, AARP Tele-Town Hall, 7/28/09)

REALITY:
• “Democrats are pushing for Medicare cuts on a scale not seen in years… The House bill … would reduce projected increases in Medicare payments to providers by more than $500 billion over 10 years, a gross cut of about 7 percent over the period. …. ‘What we hear from our members is that to them Medicare savings sounds like cuts,’ said Nora Super, AARP's chief health care lobbyist. ‘Our members over 65 really value their Medicare program ... and numbers like $500 billion are huge numbers, so that is really scary to our members.’” (Associated Press, 7/30/09)

• “Democrats seek cuts in Medicare Advantage. … Democrats want to cut Medicare Advantage by more than $120 billion over 10 years. It could leave seniors with fewer boutique Medicare options offered through private insurance companies or with private plans that offer fewer of the extra benefits such plans provide. … The White House is scrambling to fight back.” (The Boston Globe, 9/24/09)

• “Budget chief says Medicare benefits could be cut. Congress' chief budget officer is contradicting President Barack Obama's oft-stated claim that seniors wouldn't see their Medicare benefits cut under a health care overhaul. The head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf, told senators Tuesday that seniors in Medicare's managed care plans would see reduced benefits under a bill in the Finance Committee.” (Associated Press, 9/22/09)

At Least Three Million Seniors on Medicare Advantage “Displaced.” FactCheck.org found that under H.R. 3200, “it’s probable that some unknown number of the 22 percent of seniors, or more than 10 million individuals, who participate in Medicare Advantage programs would indeed need to pay more out of pocket, change plans or face reduced benefits… Kenneth E. Thorpe, professor and chair of the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University] said the number displaced by the House bill would be ‘at least’ 3 million.”

• “More than twice as many Americans (43 percent to 18 percent) say they think the legislation would weaken Medicare. …[M]ost [seniors,] 51 percent, still think reform would hurt the popular program.” (ABC News/Washington Post poll, 10/20/09)

 

 

Comments
The opinions expressed below are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily represent those of this office.
  • Carroll Hinkle commented on 11/7/2009
    Representative, I am offended that as an elected representative of the people of the US to a body that speaks for all of us, not just the radical fringe (minority in your district, that you make such empty remarks as(I paraphrase) as "they are going to force to buy insurance whether you want it or not". The people who would not accept an option to buy insurance are those who would expect doctors and hospitals to care for them even though they have no means of paying, forcing the rest of us to pay higher premiums, go without pay raises (health care employees), and put up with the demands and unreasonable expectations of these "leechers", forcing the health care institutions to go broke or lose ability to obtain credit going forward. These people require surgery, blood products, expensive medications, and then launch lawsuits or miserable complaints about the people who saved their lives. So please stop it-afford the people a little dignity by not insulting our intelligence.
  • Carroll Hinkle commented on 11/7/2009
    America's seniors (Iam one) are not stupid. We know doctors sometimes do not accept some medicare patients, or sell their practice or refer patients to other doctors if they are "too busy" . This has been going on for a long time, long before this year and the proposed health care reform legislation. We adapt and find another doctor who will accept us or our elderly relatives. In the early 90's I had to shop around for a doctor who would accept medicare patients (my elderly mother in particular), who had moved to Texas to live with me. It took some time, but we found a doctor. Lately, I have had to go to a new pcp because mine (who I have been with for over ten years)was too busy to see me for at least 6 weeks. I needed a pre suregery clearance from him. So I found a doctor who is in a practice that is better organized and closer to my home. These disappointments and temporary inconvenience (leaving my doctor who I knew) resolved for the best. They had nothing to do with the current legislation or laws that may emerge from this legislation-hence my comment that your arguments are vapid and empty, appealing to the least informed , and generally mindless complaining people.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to participate in the Ohio-8 Blog by commenting.
All comments are moderated. Comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory, contain personal attacks or obscenity, or are considered inappropriate will not be approved. We will make every reasonable effort to quickly review comments; however due to staffing constraints approval may require up to or beyond 24 hours.
You are fully responsible for any content that you post.


Representative John Boehner - 8th District Residents - Call Us Toll Free - 1-800-582-1001

Privacy Policy / Contact Information / RSS Feed / Home